ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Operator: Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the ASML 26 Third Quarter Financial Results Conference Call on 10/14/2026, After the speakers' introduction, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press *11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press *11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference call over to Mr. Jim Kavanagh, please go ahead.

Jim Kavanagh: Thank you, operator. Welcome, everyone. This is Jim Kavanagh, Head of Investor Relations at ASML. Joining me today on the call are ASML's CEO, Christophe D. Fouquet, and our CFO, Roger J. Dassen. The subject of today's call is ASML's third quarter 2026 results. Length of the call will be 60 minutes, and questions will be taken in the order that they are received. This call is also being broadcast live over the Internet at www.asml.com. A transcript of management's opening remarks and a replay of the call will be available on our website shortly following the conclusion of this call. Before we begin, I would like to caution listeners that comments made by management during this conference call will include forward-looking statements. Within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve material risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of risk factors, I encourage you to review the safe harbor statement contained in today's press release and presentation found on our website at www.asml.com. And in ASML's annual report on form 20 f and other documents as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Christophe D. Fouquet for a brief introduction.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Thank you, Jim. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our third quarter 2026 Results conference call. Before we begin the Q&A session, Roger and I would like to provide an overview and some commentary on the third quarter 2026 results. as well as provide some additional comments on the current business environment and on our future business outlook. Roger?

Roger J. Dassen: Thank you, Christophe, and welcome, everyone. I will first review the third quarter 2026 financial accomplishments and then provide guidance on the fourth quarter and the full year of 2026. Let me start with our third quarter accomplishments. Total net sales in the third quarter of 2026 were a record at €11.7 billion towards the high end of our guidance and reflecting strong execution of our capacity ramp. Net system sales were €8.4 billion which includes €4.1 billion from EUV system sales, including the sale of 1 High-NA EUV system and €4.3 billion from non-EUV system sales. Net system sales were split between logic at 54% and memory at 46%. Installed base management sales for the quarter were €3.3 billion exceeding our guidance by almost €400 million primarily due to the strong demand for our productivity upgrade products in both EUV and DUV. Gross margin for the quarter was above guidance at 57.5%, primarily due to the contribution of very high margin components within our installed base management business. Our operating expenses were as guided with R&D expenses at around €1.2 billion and SG&A expenses at around €0.4 billion The effective tax rate for Q3 was 16.1%, for the full year 2026 expected annualized effective tax rate around 17%. Net income in Q3 was €5.0 billion, which includes around €500 million as a result of an increase in the valuation of our initial investment in Mistral AI, representing 42.5% of total net sales and resulting in earnings per share of €12.95 Turning to the balance sheet. We ended the third quarter with cash, cash equivalents and short term investments at a level of €12.7 billion Our free cash flow in Q3 was €11.4 billion, underpinning the strong order momentum of our customers and related down payments. Moving to the cash return to our shareholders. In Q3, ASML paid the first interim dividend over 2026 of €1.88 per ordinary share. Further, we purchased in Q3 around €4.1 billion worth of shares under the current 2026–2028 share buyback program. The second quarterly interim dividend over 2026 will be €1.88 per ordinary share and will be made payable on 11/04/2026. With that, I would like to turn to our expectations for the fourth quarter and the full year 2026. We expect Q4 total net sales to be between €14.2 billion and €15.2 billion with a gross margin of around 57%. We expect our Q4 installed base management sales to be around €3.7 billion. The expected R&D expenses for Q4 are around €1.2 billion and SG&A is expected to be around €400 million. Regarding our full year expectations, we expect our full year 2026 total net sales to be between €44 billion and €45 billion with a gross margin of around 56%. Anticipated year over year total net sales increase of around 36% reflects our expectation of over 45% growth in EUV, around 20% growth in non-EUV-related system sales, and around 50% growth in installed base management sales. Turning to end use. This year, we expect logic net system sales to grow around 10%, and memory net system sales to grow around 75%. The growth in memory is driven by the combination of capacity expansion of our customers, and the increasing adoption of EUV on advanced DRAM nodes. As previously mentioned, We continue to expect The China region to account for around 20% of our total net sales this year. In summary, the third quarter was a record for both total net sales and gross margin, and we expect our business to continue to accelerate in the fourth quarter as we execute against a backdrop of very strong customer demand. for our products and services. With that, I would like to turn the call back over to Christophe.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Thank you, Roger. If we take a step back to look at the market environment, we see that the pace of the AI build out continues to be very robust. Supply shortages across advanced logic and memory nodes continue to increase in size and in time horizon. Against this backdrop, we had very constructive discussions with our customers throughout the quarter, and the demand signals we have received have continued to strengthen. Our leading edge high volume customers are sharing very good visibility, as a result of the increasing number of long term commitments they are securing with their customers. This extended visibility has led them to conclude that demand for their product will outpace supply through at least 2028. As a result, customers are accelerating capacity build out plans and preparing for further expansion beyond 2028. In order to better meet the anticipated level of demand. For us, their drive to add capacity is translating into not only greater short term demand, across our entire holistic lithography portfolio, but also improved longer term visibility and demand especially for EUV products. As customers shift focus to their needs beyond 2027, our order momentum continues to build. We are increasingly receiving orders for 2028, and customers are also expressing interest in placing orders for 2029 and even 2030. As our customers are preparing to meet rising demand, we in turn continue our focus on adding capacity to support their needs. Roger will now share further details on our latest plans on providing our customers additional capacity. Roger?

Roger J. Dassen: Thank you, Christophe. We have been very successful in ramping capacity this year. For low NA EUV, anticipate output of roughly 65 systems for 2026, which is nearly 50% more than the 44 systems that we shipped last year. For DUV immersion systems, while our initial output target for these systems was well below the prior year, we now expect we will deliver a similar quantity in 2026 as we did in 2025. Looking further ahead, we shared our intent last quarter to increase our capacity in 2027 by 30% for both low-NA EUV and DUV immersion systems, as well as to investigate adding a further 30% in 2028. However, given the dynamics of this quarter, we now anticipate that our current planned levels of output in 2027 and 2028 will not fully meet the demand of our customers. Therefore, we continue to strengthen our efforts to produce more systems especially beyond 2027. And with that goal in mind, are now looking into expanding our 2028 capacity even above the 30% year on year growth target that was under investigation last quarter, for both low-NA EUV and immersion systems. In addition to shipping new systems, we support customer needs for more wafer capacity through productivity upgrades, across our EUV and DUV installed base. As well as with the introduction of new products. The ability to enable an increase in capacity through upgrades on the same footprint is very compelling for our customers, as the effect is an immediate increase in output capability. We will continue to work on this important value driver, expanding the upgrade portfolio offering, new productivity options, to our customers in the coming years. The introduction of new products is the other lever that we have to support increased wafer capacity. We plan to introduce our next generation low NA EUV system, the NXE:3.8 thousandF, starting in small quantities at the beginning of 2027. This system is specified at a throughput of 260 wafers per hour, compared to the 32 wafers per hour capability of the NXE:3.8 thousandE system. We also plan to introduce the next generation critical deep UV immersion running at 330 wafers per hour. These new products will provide incrementally more wafer capacity to the industry, as they ramp in the coming years. With that, I will hand it back over to Christophe for a technology update.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Thank you, Roger. This quarter, we saw meaningful momentum around High-NA EUV. With several industry announcements providing evidence of the technology's progress from development towards production. Intel announced that it has exposed more than 1 million wafers using its High-NA EUV systems with performance that meets or exceeds comparable layers pattern using low-NA EUV. Additionally, Samsung and TSMC announced plans to introduce High-NA EUV into high volume manufacturing in 2028 and 2030, respectively. With availability across the existing High-NA, EUV fleet approaching 90%, we now expect to see adoption increase on their nodes moving forward. To further ensure chipmakers can fully leverage the advantage of High-NA EUV, we also in collaboration with TSMC began an industry wide initiative to develop larger formats EUV photomask. This collaborative effort aims to establish a 12 inch mask pilot line by 2031 and enter production in 2033. The broad support for this transition reflects customer interest in maximizing the value of High-NA EUV and in investing in the next generation of this technology. In closing, the combination of very strong demand fundamentals improved visibility, and rising litho intensity, reinforce our confidence in the trajectory of our business. Focus continues to be on supporting our customers, as they ramp their logic and memory nodes by continuing to expand our capacity over a multiyear horizon. While also delivering enhanced productivity by executing our technology roadmap. In Q3, we have also shipped the first YieldStar 550B metrology system. This overlay measurement system is designed with improved accuracy and precision to support the tighter process control requirements of the 14 angstrom node in logic and the 1d node in DRAM. The system is designed to deliver more than 60% greater productivity over the previous-generation YieldStar, allowing customers to measure more wafers and therefore more quickly drive yield improvement in their processes. This latest generation system continues to support major adoption of YieldStar by customers, with demand that is expected to more than double for the coming years versus 2025. Finally, the transition of High-NA EUV into high volume manufacturing creates a compelling opportunity for customers to enhance the economics of their future roadmap. And we remain fully committed to helping them execute a successful insertion. With that, we would like we will be happy to take your questions.

Jim Kavanagh: Thank you, Roger, and thank you, Christophe. The operator will instruct you momentarily on the protocol for the Q&A session. Before we do, I would like to ask you to kindly limit yourself to 1 question with 1 short follow-up if necessary. This will allow us to get to as many callers as possible. Now, operator, could we have your final instructions and then the first question, please?

Operator: Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press *11 on your telephone, and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 1 again. We will now go to the first question. And your first question today comes from the line of Joe Quatrochi from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Joe Quatrochi: Yes. Thanks for taking the question. I was wondering if you could provide maybe just a little additional color on the capacity expansion that you need beyond the 30% you talked about. And just what do you think you can do in 2027 relative to that kind of mid-80s that we talked about last quarter?

Christophe D. Fouquet: Well, I think that we are basically working very hard to increase capacity. And I think this is true now, as Roger explained, we have done a lot of work this quarter. that is going to be true next year, and that is going to be true in 2028. And the reason for that, as we explained, is we continue to see customer asking for more tools. Now if we look at some of the opportunity we see, of course, it is a bit easier for us to enable those opportunity later. So mostly in 2028 rather than on the shorter term. So this is what we are focusing on. I will not give new numbers for 2027 or 2028 because it is far too early to give those number. As we continue to basically do everything we can to get extra capacity.

Joe Quatrochi: Okay. And then as a follow-up, you talked about it in the prepared remarks or in the transcript. Value based pricing impacting more 2027 and 2020? Can you share any just few more additional details on that, how to think about just the kind of trajectory of gross margin from here?

Roger J. Dassen: Yeah. So those are 2 questions, right? So first, on the pricing. As we mentioned in July, we at that point, we were entering into conversations with customers on price increases. Conversations have been completed and, you know, have indeed led to pricing increases for what we call the most critical products for our customers. So that has been done. As we also. And you made reference to it as we said in the prepared remarks, this is not going to have an impact on 2026. You will see some impact on 2027, but I would say that the full impact of that is really going to start in 2020. So from 2028 onwards, you are going to see the sustained impact of that, but you will see in the course of 2027, you will see that starting to manifest itself in a positive way in both revenue and the ASPs and in the gross margin. Your second question on gross margin is obviously a much broader question. But let me take that 1 then. So what are the puts and takes on the gross margin? So as you have seen, gross margin this quarter, very, very strong. Stronger than we anticipated. I would say primarily as a result of the €400 million more upgrade business that we have. But we should also not forget that if you look at the total year at 56%, it is not just the upgrade business. Right? it is also higher volume. it is also, you know, the fact that we have a very strong low-NA EUV business in there. Very strong immersion business in there. So those are all things that help. And then, obviously, you know, the question is how will that develop in the years beyond this year? Right? So what is the implication for 2027 and beyond? And, of course, we are not going to give you a gross margin percentage for 2027. That will come. In January of 27. But if you look at the key drivers of the gross margin this year, you have to ask yourself how much of that can be sustained into 2027. So first off, volume with everything that Christophe just told you on the 30% increase in 2027, of course, volume should help. Right? And volume as long as we are able to control the cost of the increase in capacity, volume should give you better fixed cost coverage. So that should be at positive in that regard. The second element is mix. And there are 2, again, key drivers of the volume are the 30% extra in immersion and low-NA EUV. Both of them are obviously very positive from a gross margin perspective. Of course, there will be quite some dry business that we continue to increase this year, but also next year. I would say that also mix with the strength in EUV demand and immersion demand that should that should help. Then to your point, we have the price increase, which as I mentioned, will have some effect in 2027 the larger effect you will see in 2028, but it will have some effect in 2027 that is going to be helpful. And then finally, in the positive sense, I would probably call out the mix effect within EUV. Right? Where the mix effect next year is going to be better than this year because this year, we still have quite some DE models in the mix You know, that will not materially be the case anymore next year, and we will have a few apps in there as well. that is going to be helpful in the total EUV. So those are key elements. And then what are the things that we need to watch out for? Well, 1, as I mentioned, is the ramp cost. Right? So how much cost are we incurring to ramp not just, for 2027, but also for beyond? So that. that is 1 thing that we that we simply need to manage those costs well. And then there is the swing factor of the upgrades. Because as we mentioned, the upgrades are very, very strong this year. That really begs the question, how sustainable is the is the upgrade is the upgrade business? And if you look into that, the sustainability of the upgrade business, there are a few elements to bear in mind there. First off, we still see as of today that there is quite some addressable market for us on the upgrade business. If you look at the number of upgrades that we have performed in the field, it is, you know, it is quite a few tools, but there are still quite a few tools out there that have not yet been upgraded. So that gives you good potential, you know, for the coming quarter, but also for the year thereafter. Second, as we mentioned on the video, we are also aggressively pushing upgrade products. So we will bring new upgrade products to the market, and of course, that would open an entirely new addressable market for us. in the installed base. So that is helpful. And then, of course, there is a question, you know, how will the market continue in the current market environment with the demand that is out there. As we just said, there is a lot of appetite for these upgrades. So I would say upgrades is a is a is an important swing factor. For us in the gross margin development as we see 2027 and beyond. Very strong this year. But, you know, I think we are, at least from our side, doing whatever we can to create as much opportunity for upgrade business on a go forward basis as we can.

Joe Quatrochi: Appreciate all the detail. Thank you.

Roger J. Dassen: You are welcome.

Operator: Thank you. Your next question today comes from the line of Krish Sankar from TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Krish Sankar: Yeah. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Christophe or Roger, my first 1, I understand you do not want to give exact capacity numbers. I am just wondering, in a strong demand environment, Is there a natural ceiling on your EV output, either due to pace at VDL or Carl Zeiss capacity? In other words, if the demand is there, can you do 140 or 150 units in 2028? Along the same line, do you worry that customers are pulling in orders or giving you bigger forecast just to secure a slot? I had a quick follow-up after that.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Yeah. So maybe let me try to answer both questions. So first on maybe what we are doing to, to increase the capacity. So I think I mentioned that before. This is a task where we started several months ago. And I think there are really 3 elements to it. The first 1 is to optimize the footprint we have here in order to basically build our machines. We have, as you know, a pretty, important footprint and we started to make sure that most of that footprint can be used for output. And that is true for low NA EUV. that is also true, by the way, for DUV including immersion. And this creates already some opportunity that we can use and build up again this year, next year, and in 2028. The second 1, which I think is a very big opportunity and still a major parameter is, the cycle time. Meaning, the time we spend in our factory with a certain given machines. And as we gain in maturity, for example, on the NXT 1.3 thousand 38 hundred e, we are capable of shortening the cycle time. For certain given sequence, but we are also capable of further optimizing the sequence. Meaning, there are things that we needed to do initially in order to qualify a tool, which over time, in agreement with our customer, we believe we do not have to do anymore. And I would say that this approach we can take pretty far, moving forward. And this is 1 of the really key levers we see basically, moving forward. And as I mentioned before, you know, as we go over time, you know, the opportunity continue to materialize. Which give us some more, hope and opportunity. The supply chain, of course, I mean, indirectly, your question is or your remark is that we have to supply the supply chain. This is something that we take into account, starting with Zeiss. We do not see, Zeiss today as a bottleneck. For, the capacity expansion we are discussing. Even beyond the 30% we mentioned for 2028. And we have done in recent years a lot of work with all the supply chain to make sure that the supply chain will not be an issue for us. So we continue, of course, to watch that very carefully. We understand that every time you add capacity, of course, we create more challenges there. So we do that. And the last thing I will say is that we have time. I mean, if you look at the progress we have made this year, I think they are very significant. We are feeling pretty good about next year. And the time we have, again, for next year, for 2028, is still significant for us to continue to be very creative on all those fronts. So that is, is the answer to your first question. On the second 1, I think I mentioned in the introduction, we have very good conversations with our customers. And the conversation is not only about, you know, how many tool they need. it is also about exactly when those tool will be hitting the ground in their factories. And, you know, when it comes to the demand we are referring to, the increased demand we are referring to, I think we are very much capable to validate the demand with some more detailed plan our customers are sharing with us in term of fab construction, release, etcetera, etcetera. So I think that, you know, we talk about demand, when we refer to demand in those discussion, we really refer to demand we believe is real and not inflated by any potential buying behavior from our customer.

Krish Sankar: Gotcha. that is super helpful, Christophe. Then a quick follow-up for Roger. On the value pricing, is this across the board? Is it for systems, services, spare parts, everything? And I am guessing based on your commentary, you are not repricing the backlog. Can you just clarify that? Thank you.

Roger J. Dassen: Yeah. Exactly how we do it, Krish. I am not going to share. But as I mentioned, we are increasing prices for what we call the most critical products. Those products that bring most value to our customers. So these are the high-range, high-volume manufacturing products. Those are the ones that provide most value to customers in the current environment, and those are the ones that we you know, that we put the pricing increases on it. And you will also understand that upgrade prices are closely associated with the prices of the tools. So, you know, that--that is--they will also follow upgrade prices will also follow this pattern. that is how we do it, and exactly how we do it you know, when we do it, etcetera. I do not wanna go into any detail. But the bottom line is that you will start to see the effect on that in the course of 2027. But the full effect you will start to see from 2028 and onwards.

Krish Sankar: Thanks a lot, Roger.

Roger J. Dassen: You are welcome.

Operator: Thank you. Your next question today comes from the line of Sandeep Despande from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Analyst: Thank you for letting me on. My question is back again to the question of your indication that you are looking at adding more capacity than the 30% into 2028. There are multiple components that you need to be able to add capacity And some of these suppliers of ASML will need to add physical capacity to be able to supply you with this kind of huge volume increases given that there is already a 30% increase in 2027. Have these discussions started with customers Does ASML need to make any substantial payments to these suppliers in terms of adding this capacity And are there any particular impediments? And given that yourself do not have any additional physical capacity till 2029, How is this whole supply chain being managed to be able to produce more capacity in 2028? And I have a quick follow-up after that. Thank you.

Christophe D. Fouquet: So I would try to add a bit to what I said before. I think that you know, the only real challenge we have with the supply chain is to make sure they can ramp. I think that there is not question on their side on the, you say, strength of the demand, on the strength of the ramp I think that the main challenge with all our suppliers, because in this case, with all the suppliers, is make sure that they can go up, 30% every year. Now Roger mentioned it before, in the introduction. We went up this year by 50% on EUV, which is the sign basically that these are the kind of things we are capable to do with the suppliers. And as you can imagine, that is a discussion that we have with them on a very regular basis. And us, mentioning 30% growth in 2027 more than 30% growth in 2028, is the results of the confidence we have that this entire supply chain can, of course, follow our own demand, both on EUV and DQB. That exercise, I will say, of course, could be expanded as far as needed. Because we are continuing also to add, I will say, suppliers. So we are continuing to make sure so that we have more and more people who can produce some of our parts. Especially the noncritical 1. And when it comes to the very critical 1, you know, Zeiss comes to mind again, We are absolutely strategically aligned on, you know, the trajectory of, the industry and, therefore, the trajectory of the demand. So these are very, very detailed intense discussion. But again, every number we share with you is the reserves of us having validated that the supply chain can, of course, follow those numbers.

Analyst: Thank you, Christophe. Quickly, Roger, on the gross margin, your guidance on gross margin in the fourth quarter is down from the current quarter, even though your revenues are going up significantly? And then, I mean, just again, regarding a response you made earlier about the value based pricing, Would should we assume that most of the value based pricing related increases will go straight down to the gross margin line? Or is there a is there a margin number on these increases that you will be putting through?

Roger J. Dassen: So on the first 1, the gross margin in Q4, a little bit lower from Q3. That is primarily related to the fact that we are seeing some ramp costs. Right? So we are ramping up for the increases that Christophe was just talking about. That has a bit of a bearing on the on the on the on the gross margin expectation. And that is why the fixed cost coverage that you would expect to benefit from the higher volume is a little bit compensated and a bit more compensated by the extra cost that we incur in the ramp as we see it now in Q4. that is the that is the main reason that we have there. In terms of the price increase and to what extent is the price increase completely accretive to the to the gross margin? Of course, there, the same applies. Right? I mean, 1 of the arguments that we had also in our conversations with our customers is that we are incurring costs in order to, to ramp. So ramp cost will give you some additional cost. So it will definitely be accretive to the gross margin. You But again, you will see some ramp costs that we are incurring in 2027 in order to get to the elevated numbers that Christophe was just talking about. And this is both for ourselves, but also into the supply chain for the reasons that something you just mentioned. Right? We need to make sure that the supply chain is completely attuned to what we are looking for. And for that also means that in some places, there is some help needed to get that done. So there is some portion of the increase, of the price increase that we need to cover for the extraordinary ramp that we are going through But I would say that is still a significant part of it is directly accretive to the gross margin.

Analyst: Thank you, Roger.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from the line of François Bourvignet from UBS. Please go ahead.

Francois Bourvignet: Thank you very much. Just wanted to follow-up a bit on this shortage situation. Obviously, we are in a very unprecedented time with this capacity constraint for your customers. But also today, you are claiming that on your side as well, the demand will be higher than supply. So I mean, the behavior usually is that people order as much as they can. Especially if you start seeing some ramp to make sure they have the tools And we have seen other industries some long-term agreements, some prepayment, to try to get to a more true sense of the demand. I was wondering if you were considering any change of the way you want to contract with your customers in those times? For example, you know, increasing the prepayments or also, you know, like, more the firm orders earlier. To make sure, you know, that, your customers are committed.

Roger J. Dassen: Yeah. So if we take that, and we said it before, if you put an order with ASML, that is not a frivolous piece of paper that you put your name under. It comes with 2 serious commitments. 1 serious commitment is a commitment to make a down payment, and as I qualified it before, it is a down payment that is enough to hurt. So that is 1 element. And secondly, you know, a PO is a real commitment. On both sides of the equation, and it also means that it is, you know, it is it is deep. If you want to get rid of that commitment, that is not gonna be easy. Right? That comes at a price, not just the down payment. But more than that. So therefore, before customers sign a PO with ASML, they have made up their mind They are not doing this they are not doing this, frivolously. In terms of will you accept orders early on? Well, as Christophe mentioned, we are getting the request of customers to, you know, to accept for us to accept their orders their POs already for 2029 and 30. And the only reason why Christophe worded it in that way that customers are requesting us and therefore we have not yet accepted those is that we want to make sure that we have a good picture of what the overall demand in 2029 and 2030 looks like what customers are currently signaling. And mirror that against the capacity expansion as we see it at that point in time. We want to do that because we do not want now to accept you know, orders from customers A, B, and C, and then to tell customer d who has not, you know, given orders yet for 2029 and 2030. Sorry. We are sold out. I mean, that would be totally inappropriate for you know, customers that have been business partners for us for a very long period of time. So we are now really using this period of time to mirror. To get a good understanding what is the total demand that our customers are signaling for the 2029, 2020, 30, time frame. What does that look like? What is for us a reasonable expectation of capacity as we see it in the 2029, 2030 time frame? And once we have that picture ready, then we are ready to accept orders. And you know, also accept the commitments from our side to execute in those orders. So the only hesitation we have at this stage is that we really want to do our homework and be very diligent on the acceptance of the orders that customers are offering us to make sure that no single customer, you know, feels left out.

Francois Bourvignet: Thank you. That was a very good, detailed answer. detailed. The second 1 is on the High-NA news flow. I mean, Christophe, you mentioned this high volume manufacturing in 2028 with the memory guys. And also TSMC in 2030. And if I look at the past low NA when we started the high volume manufacturing, I mean, we saw a significant step up between shipments. During those years. So I was wondering if we should think about High-NA shipments in 2028 to increase significantly on the back of it and potentially double digit number of High-NA shipments, to as we go forward.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Well, I think it is, you know, we are still looking at the very initial ramp. I think that you are going indeed to see that, you know, every year our customer are going to need more tool. As they validate in manufacturing that they like High-NA and that most probably they plan over time more layers. I think the announcement, and the drive of TSMC first on the 12 inch critical mass, is very interesting there because the first signal it gives is that, in the mind of the customer, there would be more and more use of High-NA. Because if it were not the case, no 1 would really bother to go to 12 inch mask on High-NA. So the 12-inch mask drive and very wide adoption by customer and the consumption is just a sign that everyone has in mind over time to develop basically more and more adoption of High-NA. So with that, you know, it is always difficult to say exactly how this will, basically, manifest itself. We also have, of course, a very big ramp, so there is a lot of focus on building up capacity, which sometimes can have, you know, positive or negative impact on the High-NA rollout, depending if customers see High-NA as additional capacity or potentially a bit of a slowdown. But, the number will grow for sure year after year. And, the message, I think all our customers have given this quarter with their participation into the 12-inch consortium is that they believe over time, this really become a very important technology and the number of players will grow over time for sure.

Francois Bourvignet: Great. Thank you very much.

Christophe D. Fouquet: You are welcome.

Operator: Thank you. Your next question today comes from the line of Lee Simpson from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Lee Simpson: Hi, good morning. Thanks for having me. I just follow-up to the last answer set. I thought it was quite interesting that, you know, if you look at the noncurrent liabilities, there is quite a material jump QonQ. We are off the order of about €5 billion And, typically, the bulk of that is down payment. So can we make a read through to a relative size of a big order intake in Q3? that is question number 1. And I think maybe alongside that, it did seem to infer, Christophe, in your answer to the last question that it is perhaps new customers that are bringing you to sort of thinking about the 2029 and 2030 sort of framework. And as you say, you still wanna keep your marginal buyers still in the mix here. Are we right in saying that most of this is coming from new customers as a result? Thanks.

Roger J. Dassen: So on the on the first 1, the non current liabilities, does that include down payments? Yes, it does. Right? So in that way, it is a interesting gauge of, you know, of how order intake is developing. I should say it is a bit of a lagging indicator. Because, typically, the, you know, the down payment and the receipt of the money you know, lags a little bit the actual signing of the of the PO. So it is a bit of a lagging indicator, but for lack of any PO numbers that you get from ASML, it is it is it is a nice it is a nice it is a nice proxy. Yep. Yeah.

Christophe D. Fouquet: I am not sure I fully understood the second question.

Roger J. Dassen: So I think the second question, I think, was on you know, the customers in 2029, 2030 that expressed an interest to do that, I think your question is, Lee, is that is that a totally new customer? That might potentially start with a T, and, might this be that this customer is, in that way, sort of locking out existing customers. But I better put it than I would. And I guess the answer is that the interest of this being expressed is much broader. it is much broader. This is not linked to 1 specific customer. There is a far broader interest in customers to place POs for that time period.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Yeah. And maybe to add to that because you mentioned a new customer indirectly. I think what is interesting on low NA EUV, we have talked about increased adoption of, UV We continue to see, in fact, new customers on low-NA EUV, especially when it comes to DRAM. And I would say this goes a bit beyond the T customer. So that is another interesting dynamic, that we have to indeed take into account for 2028, 2029, 2030. that is another, of course, challenge when it comes to the capacity discussion we are having. But I think it is a great news when it comes to the validation of how EUV will be used moving forward. And the last thing I will say is that we see a similar trend on High-NA. So that is I think, also a very good set of news we get from our potentially new customers.

Lee Simpson: Great. Thanks for that.

Christophe D. Fouquet: You are welcome.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from the line of Alexander Duval from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Alexander Duval: Yes. Many thanks for the question. Just wanted to pivot a bit and talk about immersion DUV. You talked today about how you will reach a throughput of 330 wafers per hour. So I wondered what that could directionally mean for pricing in 2028 and whether we should be thinking about the kind of ASP step ups we saw historically on EUV tools when we think about the innovation you are delivering on immersion. And then I would like to think also secondarily, as a follow-up, on logic versus memory. I wondered if it is fair to say that in the prior quarter, the incremental demand seemed to be very much related to memory. But now you seem to be seeing quite a strong balance across both logic and memory. So curious to what extent you would agree with that statement and what is driving this whether it might be across drivers like Gen AI, or it could be progress either with existing customers or new customers. Many thanks.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Yeah. I can start So I appreciate the question on the 330 wafers per hour because this is 1 of the I would say, the very short term action we have taken to increase capacity We are going to bring the different immersion product to 330 wafers per hour. You know that we have slightly different version of our immersion tool depending on the overlay requirement for our customer. But all of them at the beginning of next year, will go to 330 wafers per hour. And when it comes to, to value and therefore to pricing, as we discussed many time for EUV, the price, the value scale basically with the throughput. And I think what is true for EUV will be true also for DUV. So this is both an opportunity on value, margin, pricing, it is also, of course, very helpful when it comes to capacity. Because you look at, of course, providing the same capacity with potentially less too. Does not mean that we need less tools. It means that we get more capacity for our customer, of course. So that is another, I would say, creative move we have made on our portfolio to get more capacity out. And we expect, again, the value to come to us in the same way for this new product. that is for DUV. On the second question, I think that Roger gave some number. If you look at the increase compared to last year, memory has gone up very much. We are seeing a trend where memory is becoming more and more important, 75% increase, which is, of course, significant. So you start to see the results of this huge memory investment that, by the way, is mostly DRAM, to be clear. And we continue to see that moving forward. And we have said in the past that the ratio between logic and memory will most normally increase toward memory. Still, I would say that logic is also very strong. So to be able to predict exactly where this is going to land is difficult because I would like to stress that we see also a very strong demand on the logic side, because, of course, as you know, the 2 are very much coupled when it comes to delivering AI capacity to the market.

Roger J. Dassen: Yeah. And just to give you 1 more data point there. So indeed, as I mentioned, logic went up at around 10%, But the advanced logic piece, included in there is far higher, right? So that grew over 25% expected to grow over 25% in this in this year. So you are right. Memory is getting closer to logic, but logic remains very, very important. And you know, when we look at 2027, memory comes close. But I still believe that logic will outweigh memory in the in total book of business for next year.

Alexander Duval: Thanks.

Operator: Thank you. The next question today comes from the line of Chris Caso from Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.

Chris Caso: Yes. Thank you. Good morning. My question is with regard to your customer clean room constraints. And, you know, perhaps you could discuss that with respect to your decisions to expand capacity into 28. Do you expect that clean room is still a constraint on your customer's ability to add tools and add capacity? And then what does that mean as you go into potentially 2029?

Christophe D. Fouquet: Well, you know, I think there is still some, what I would call, tactical constraints. It could be that, 1 system will move from end of the quarter to the beginning of another 1, we do not see too much of that, to be honest. But that is still, possible because our customer have been ramping their cleanroom facility extremely fast. If we look at the longer term, as I said before, beyond those little moves or those tactical moves, we have confirmed that the numbers customers are giving us are really lined up with their plan. In fact, in many cases, you know, when the supply is tight, we make sure before we fully allocate a tool to a customer that the space will be there, The facility also will be there so that we do not ship a tool that will be waiting for weeks for a customer to use it, because, of course, other customer would be very disappointed with that. So we do a lot of work to make sure that in all the plans we have at ASML, we do not have a delay of more than a few days or weeks, I would say, in shipping our product. So short answer is, I think, no. We do not see our customer clean room being a major factor on our demand.

Roger J. Dassen: And to your point, Christophe,, it is it is very clear that, that with everything that is being built today, it is such a massive scale. On the 1 hand, that opens a significant opportunity. But it also means that our customers have to manage the execution of all the construction in 2027-2028 very diligently. Right? So they. They are looking at a huge expansion of their footprint, but, of course, that requires very diligent execution. And that is obviously something that we need to that we need to monitor very, very carefully. So in that way, conceptually, a lot of opportunity and not a constraint, but in reality, we need to make sure that they execute well so it does not become a constraint.

Chris Caso: Thank you. As a follow-up follow-up question is with regard to China, and you talked about that at 20%. Of your systems revenue this year. What should we expect going forward with respect to China Do you expect it to maintain those levels as you go into next year?

Roger J. Dassen: I think the intrinsic demand in China is strong. Right? If you look at if you look at what China needs in terms of mainstream logic, in terms of memory, there is very strong demand in China for domestic consumption. If you look at the fabs that are being built in China, that is that is. You know, there is a lot coming online. There. And therefore, you know, we would expect that the demand in China to be strong, you know, this year this year, 20%. And I would argue that also for 2020 and beyond based on the intrinsic drivers, it seems that the demand situation in China remains very strong.

Chris Caso: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Your next question today comes from the line of Tammy Qiu from Berenberg. Please go ahead.

Tammy Qiu: Hi, thank you for taking my question. So firstly, it is on your value based pricing. So this year, you have. You are increasing pricing. Going forward, let's say, this tightness in the industry continues. Do you think you will be able to negotiate price increase every single year?

Roger J. Dassen: Well, Tammy, that was not the plan, to be honest. [Smiling] Yeah. We were smiling. Our customers are listening. Yes. Exactly. Yep. Exactly. That was not the plan. So, you know, we. We have had these conversations with customers that, you know, given everything that the ecosystem is going through, and given the efforts that we are all going through to meet the ramp requirements. We thought that we were entitled to a higher percentage, and we were able to get there with customers. And we would see that as something that is possible within our value based pricing model. But we would not be looking at repeating this every year or so. That is not the plan. No.

Christophe D. Fouquet: I would add to that, Roger. it is still I think mostly, you know, this is-- Mostly 1 of the very first time we have this discussion with customer. If you go back many, many years back this is something we never did. And Roger mentioned, in the introduction, the discussions were constructive. I think they were more than constructive, meaning there was a clear acceptance maybe the overall value in the ecosystem is shifting. And that is triggered by, of course, AI to some extent, And I will say, you know, we will see what the future brings, but at least we have been able to have a very good, very mature discussion, which I think is very important. So something we never did before, we do not want to do that every year because that is that is not the purpose. But I think that it is very good that in principle, at least, we have the ability mostly once in a while, to discuss again what is the real value of lithography in the entire ecosystem.

Roger J. Dassen: Absolutely. And, Tammy, as you know, 1 of the key objectives for us in the pricing conversation is to make sure that we never depart from the concept of value based pricing. Because we do not wanna be in a position that if the market goes down, that we are actually having discussions with customers on price decreases. I mean. And that is very well understood in the conversations with our customers as we have had it. So to Christophe's point, these have been conversations about fairness. But, you know, the premise that we are able to capture value of the next generation of tools And as a result of that, we are able to continue to increase the price and commensurate with the value that it brings. That is a principle that we want to sustain even if the market goes backward a bit. So that is the that is the reason why we are not opportunistic pricing, while we are not opportunistically seizing the opportunity and while we are executing along the lines of what Christophe just described.

Tammy Qiu: Okay. Thank you. that is really clear. And secondly, regarding your exposure in China, So I understand that China may never be able to compete with you from a technology perspective. But going to, let's say, 2029-ish, when you work out a low-end version of an immersion tool, do you think that will risk your potential to price at a premium versus the Chinese local players? Or your potential margin in Chinese market? May need to come lower?

Christophe D. Fouquet: Well, I think there is a lot of, of course, speculation in the in the question. But, where we are today, I think, with our Chinese customer is that they all want to work with us. I think this is very clear. I will not give any market share number, but you can imagine it is extremely high especially on immersion. And, therefore, you know, as long as we have a good market access, as long as they can work with us. I think that the likelihood of a major competition in China is still pretty low. that is the first thing I will say. The second is, of course, you know, if you know, they were to not have access to some of our tools, then you get a lot more motivation. But it is still a very, very long way to go. And I think that we have been having this discussion about you know, China having a tool to compete with us for the last 25 years And, you know, every other years, we get the news that this is coming. If you stick to fact, I think the fact this year are not different from the fact a year ago or even 5 years ago. So I think that the progress is not very strong. The motivation is not strong at all. And I think that as long. Again, as we preserve market access in reasonable means, we should be fine.

Tammy Qiu: Okay. Thank you.

Christophe D. Fouquet: You are welcome.

Jim Kavanagh: Okay. I just wanted to remind, we have got time for 1 last question. So Sharon, can I ask you to ask the final question, please? And then if there are follow on questions, please contact ASML Investor Relations. And we will do our best to follow-up. So, operator, can we have that last question, please?

Operator: Thank you. Your final question today comes from the line of Stéphane Houri from ODDO BHF. Please go ahead.

Stéphane Houri: Yes. Hello. Thank you for taking my Actually, my question was on China initially, but just to understand the discussions that you have on 2029 and 2030, if it is more because you seem to be very positive at the moment on memory. If it is very balanced between memory and logic or if it is still memory manufacturer who are giving you, some visibility on 29, sorry, in 2030. Thank you.

Christophe D. Fouquet: Well, I think you need both memory and logic to get some AI chips. I think we have a big discussion with both sets of customers because they get the same message from their own customer. I think today, DRAM is a bit more aggressive on the buildup of those capacity But, yeah, we have discussion with both. So I think we see equal interest in call, I will say, demand trajectory for both DRAM and logic because you need both basically to get the product out.

Stéphane Houri: And in DRAM, is it at the same time, the U.S., Korea, and even China, or is it more concentrated from a geographic standpoint?

Christophe D. Fouquet: No. I think that, we are mostly talking about EUV in this case. So this excludes China.

Stéphane Houri: Okay. Yep. Good. Thank you.

Jim Kavanagh: Okay. Thank you, everyone. On behalf of ASML, I would like to thank you for joining the call today. Operator, if you could formally conclude the call, that would be very much appreciated. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. This concludes the ASML 26 third quarter financial results conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.